Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Cnty. of Mendocino

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided August 8, 2018No. A152004PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKline, P.J.

*1019This appeal arises out of a challenge to the validity of a Mendocino County ballot measure, Measure AI, which imposed a tax on commercial cannabis businesses (Mendocino County Code, § 6.32.010 et seq.) and which was approved by a simple majority of county voters. Michael Johnson, Pebbles Trippet, Terry Johnson, Noel Manners, Paula Deeter, Ron Edwards, and Ralf Laguna (plaintiffs) appeal the trial *446court's order of dismissal after the court sustained the demurrer of the County of Mendocino (County) without leave to amend and denied plaintiffs' motion *1020for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Mansell v. Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Department of Mental Hygiene v. KirchnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Department of Mental Hygiene of Cal. v. KirchnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alameda County Taxpayers' Assn. v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  2. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Bay Area Toll AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. Coachella Valley Water Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. Jobs & Housing Coalition v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Legislature of the State of Cal. v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API