Legal Opinion
Redevelopment Agency v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 28, 2003No. D041882PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MCINTYRE, J.
In this action we conclude that the Polanco Redevelopment Act (the Act) (Health & Saf. Code, § 33459 et seq.; all undesignated section references are to this code) allows a redevelopment agency to bring a civil action for an order compelling responsible parties to remove or remedy environmental contamination within a project area and that the redevelopment agency need not plead direct financial jeopardy to have standing to sue.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On this appeal of a judgment of dismissal entered after the sustaining of a demurrer, we accept as true all the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burden v. SnowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Carsten v. Psychology Examining CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Modesto Redevelopment Agency v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- City of Brentwood v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Doe v. Lincoln Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Rossdale Grp., LLC v. Walton, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Ukiah Citizens for Safety First v. City of UkiahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.