Legal Opinion

Smith v. American Employers' Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 30, 1960No. 4805PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.

The question presented is whether RSA ch. 281 deprives the plaintiff employee of her right to proceed at common law against a third party for allegedly negligently causing her injury, when the third party is her employer’s workmen’s compensation insurance carrier. The defendant contends that it does so. The issue is one of legislative intent and to determine it we must examine our workmen’s compensation statute.

The material portions of RSA 281:14 read as follows: “When an injury for which compensation is payable under the provisions of this chapter has been sustained under circumstances…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Schulz v. Standard Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1954

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. Beasley v. MacDonald Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  4. Walls v. Oxford Management Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  5. George K. Brough v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio, and Third Party v. Carpenter & Paterson, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API