Legal Opinion

Falk v. Amsberry

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1977No. 74-5251, SC 24663PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

Plaintiffs filed this action to recover damages they incurred because of defendants’ refusal to permit them to harvest a grass seed crop growing on defendants’ land. Both parties moved for directed verdicts; the trial court denied plaintiffs’ motion and granted defendants’. Plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, are grass seed farmers. For approximately 10 years they leased some 76 acres of farm land from the owner of the land, Norman Larsen. The lease was oral; there is some dispute as to whether the parties intended the lease to be of indefinite duration or to be a yearly lease…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sievers v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Francis Bros. v. SchallbergerOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Myer v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Hostetler v. EcclesOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Gentry v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Falk v. AmsberryOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Gerald P. And Patricia Andersen v. Bureau of Indian AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. Falk v. AmsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Gallager v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Leigh v. LynchIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API