Legal Opinion

Bruns v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1941No. L. A. 17850Published

1Opinion of the Court

18 Cal.2d 667 (1941)

PAUL H. BRUNS, Petitioner,

v.

THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

L. A. No. 17850.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Oct. 1, 1941.

Paul H. Bruns in pro. per., L. J. Styskal and M. E. Barth for Petitioner.

W. Eugene Craven and Joe Crider, Jr., for Respondent.

THE COURT.

In two separate proceedings instituted before a local administrative committee of The State Bar of California, petitioner was charged with (1) acceptance of a fee from a client upon false assurances that a suit would be filed, misrepresenting to the client that suit had been filed although no legal services…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Marsh v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Waterman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Bruns v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Stanford v. the State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API