Legal Opinion

Malt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 2009No. 84 MAP 2007, 85 MAP 2007PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

This appeal presents the issue of whether an establishment that sells malt or brewed beverages (“beer”)1 solely for takeout and prohibits consumption of beer on its premises qualifies as a “retail dispenser,” as defined by Section 102 of the Liquor Code (“Code”), 47 P.S. § 1-102.2 We hold that such an establishment does not qualify as a retail dispenser and, accordingly, affirm the order of the Commonwealth Court.

In January of 2004, Ohio Springs, Inc., (Ohio Springs), filed an application with the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board (PLCB) for the transfer of both the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. ShifflerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Housing Authority of Chester v. Pennsylvania State Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Application of El Rancho Grande, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Wirth v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Phoenixville Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Tri-County Landfill, Inc. v. Pine Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Kohl v. New Sewickley Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API