Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commonwealth v. Giulian v. Aplt.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 2016No. 75 MAP 2015Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Baer

I concur in the result. I agree that Appellant, Victoria Giulian, is not statutorily barred from seeking an expungement of her 1997 conviction under 18 Pa.C.S. § 9122(b)(3)(i). I write separately to provide my statutory analysis, and to stress that this case does not require the Court to determine whether expungement statutes are penal or remedial for purposes of statutory construction.

Like the majority, I find ambiguity in the language of Subsection 9122(b)(3)(i), providing that an individual may petition for expungement of a summary offense when she “has been free of arrest or prosecution…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FithianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Freedom Medical Supply, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. School District of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. In the Interest of A.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. GiulianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API