Legal Opinion

OMAR v. STATE OF MAINE DHHS

District Court, D. Maine

Decided April 4, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00065Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ARAFAT ABDI OMAR, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) No. 2:25-cv-00065-SDN ) MAINE DEPARTMENT ) OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES et al., ) ) Defendants ) RECOMMENDED DISMISSAL Because I granted Arafat Abdi Omar’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, see Order (ECF No. 4), his complaint (ECF No. 1) is now before me for preliminary review. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (stating that when a party proceeds in forma pauperis, a court “shall dismiss the case at any time if” it determines that the action “is frivolous or malicious[,] . . . fails to state a claim…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lance v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Sanchez v. Pereira-CastilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Poirier v. Massachusetts Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. Marcello v. MaineDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API