Legal Opinion

Poirier v. Massachusetts Department of Correction

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 27, 2009No. 08-1290PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAHL, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Melissa Poirier brought a civil rights claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Massachusetts Department of Corrections (DOC) and Kathleen Dennehy, its Commissioner. 1 Poirier, a former DOC prison guard, claimed that her constitutional right to intimate association was violated when she was fired for conducting a romantic relationship with a former inmate, in violation of department rules. The district court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), concluding that the DOC’s actions survived rational basis review. Poirier…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. Pereira-CastilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Matusick v. Erie County Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. Crystal Starnes v. Butler County Court of CommonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  4. Giragosian v. BettencourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  5. Liu v. AmercoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API