Legal Opinion
Marcello v. Maine
District Court, D. Maine
Decided January 8, 2007No. Docket 06-68-B-WPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND TO DESIGNATE EXPERT WITNESSES AFTER DEADLINE
COHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The plaintiffs, who appear pro se in this action, move for leave to amend their complaint to add a party plaintiff and to expand their specific allegations against the defendants. Motion for Leave to File New Amended Complaint (Docket No. 72) and proposed Amended Bill of Complaint, attached thereto. They also seek to extend by four days the deadline imposed by this court’s scheduling order for designation of their expert witnesses. Motion for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pagan v. CalderonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Montgomery Blair Sibley v. Maxine Cohen LandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- BARTH v. WATERBORODistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
- OMAR v. STATE OF MAINE DHHSDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2025
- REARDON v. LOWES COMPANIES INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024