Legal Opinion

Lance v. Dennis

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 21, 2006No. 05-555PublishedCited by 942 opinions

1Per curiam

The Rooker-Feldman doctrine prevents the lower federal courts from exercising jurisdiction over cases brought by “state-court losers” challenging “state-court judgments rendered before the district court proceedings commenced.” Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U. S. 280, 284 (2005). In this case, the District Court dismissed the plaintiffs’ suit on the ground that they were in privity with a state-court loser. We hold that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine does not bar the plaintiffs from proceeding, and vacate the District Court’s judgment.

I

This is the latest of several…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by942 opinions

  1. Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Great Western Mining & Mineral Co. v. Fox Rothschild LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  3. Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  4. Hukic v. Aurora Loan ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Mann v. BoatrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

937 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API