Castro v. State

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

The conviction is for the possession of marihuana; the punishment, life.

The first ground of error is that the trial court prohibited appellant’s cross-examination of Officer Chavez upon matters relating to appellant’s defense of entrapment.

To support his position, the appellant, in his brief refers to the following testimony of Officer Chavez:

“Q Did you have a man — did you not tell Albert Castro that you had another man downstairs in regards to this?

“A No, sir.

“Q Do you remember discussion a man by the name of Alturo Castro?

“State’s Counsel: Your Honor, I object to all…