Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided January 30, 1991No. 07-90-0045-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYD, Justice.

Appellant Russell Bailey brings this appeal from his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance and the resultant jury-assessed punishment of forty-five (45) years in the Department of Corrections. 1 In seven points, appellant says the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion for mistrial when the prosecutor, in closing argument at the punishment phase, encouraged the jury to speculate about testimony which the witness Glenn Osborn would have given if he had been allowed to do so; (2) in overruling his motion to discover the identification of the informant; (8) in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Bower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Long v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  2. Aguirre, Rigoberto v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
  3. Carl Long v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2004
  4. Damien Demarquis Huckaby v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  5. Damien Demarquis Huckaby v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API