Martin v. State

OPINION

THOMAS, Chief Justice.

Appellant was convicted of possession of over five pounds of marihuana. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.121 (Vernon 1992). He complains that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction and that the court erred when it admitted evidence concerning the value of the marihuana and an alleged extraneous offense. Other points relate to the denial of a motion to suppress the marihuana as evidence and the denial of a motion for a new trial. We will affirm.

Appellant’s eighth point is that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. To…