Legal Opinion
Piepenburg v. Cutler
District Court, D. Utah
Decided December 3, 1980No. Civ. No. C 80-0637PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
JENKINS, District Judge.
James Piepenburg, petitioner herein, was convicted by a jury in the Third District Court, Salt Lake County, Utah on the 18th day of May, 1978, of three violations of 76-10-1204, Utah Code Annotated, a statute which prohibits, among other things, the exhibition of pornographic films.1
He appealed his conviction to the Utah State Supreme Court. The Utah Supreme Court unanimously affirmed his conviction on October 26, 1979.2 Petitioner made no effort to take the matter from the Utah Supreme Court to the United States Supreme Court by certiorari…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Heller v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- James Piepenburg v. Roger Cutler, City Attorney of Salt Lake City, Utah, and E. D. Hayward, Sheriff of Salt Lake County, UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Community Television of Utah, Inc. v. Roy CityDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
- Home Box Office, Inc. v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
- Home Box Office, Inc. v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982