Legal Opinion
James Piepenburg v. Roger Cutler, City Attorney of Salt Lake City, Utah, and E. D. Hayward, Sheriff of Salt Lake County, Utah
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 21, 1981No. 80-2317PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
The defendant Piepenburg was convicted in the District Court in the State of Utah for three violations of the state statute § 76-10-1204, Utah Code Annotated (1953). This particular provision prohibits the exhibition of pornographic films. The defendant appealed his conviction to the Utah Supreme Court; that Court unanimously confirmed his conviction. State v. Piepenburg, 602 P.2d 702 (Utah 1979). Mr. Piepenburg did not pursue the matter to the Supreme Court of the United States. Having exhausted his state remedies, he was at liberty to pursue the cause…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Robert S. HaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- SUSAN WAKEEN DOLL COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ASHTON-DRAKE GALLERIES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- M.S. News Co. v. CasadoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Ripplinger v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.