Legal Opinion

Community Television of Utah, Inc. v. Roy City

District Court, D. Utah

Decided December 22, 1982No. Civ. NC 82-0122J, NC 82-0171JPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JENKINS, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Community Television of Utah (Community), brought this action against the City of Roy asserting that an amendment to the Roy City Ordinance 1 directed at the content of cable television transmissions was overly broad, facially defective and unconstitutional.

Plaintiffs, McCleary, Ulrich and Williams, receivers over cable of electronic signals distributed by Community, filed a separate action asserting that the Roy City Ordinance was, as to them, facially defective, overly broad and unconstitutional.

The actions were consolidated. The cases…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Tooley v. Seven Thirty-Five East Colfax, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. M.S. News Co. v. CasadoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  3. Dumas v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1986
  4. Preferred Communications, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Preferred Communications, Inc. v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API