Legal Opinion

In Re Habeas Corpus Application of Pierpoint

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 1, 2001No. 86,079PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

The Norton Correctional Facility (NCF) appeals a district court order enjoining NCF from proceeding with a disciplinary hearing against an inmate unless the inmate’s retained attorney is allowed to participate in the hearing. NCF claims (1) the inmate was required to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing a K.S.A. 2000 Supp. 60-1501 habeas corpus petition; (2) under these circumstances, an inmate has no constitutional right to representation by retained legal counsel in a class II disciplinary proceeding; and (3) administrative…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. In the Interest of J.D.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Hogue v. BruceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. CHELF v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  5. Washington v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API