Legal Opinion

Washington v. Roberts

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided February 23, 2007No. 96,429PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

Marcus Washington appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of his K.S.A. 60-1501 petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Washington argues that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing the claims in his K.S.A. 60-1501 petition that his due process rights were violated by the following: (1) the hearing officer refused to require the charging officer to be present at the disciplinary hearing; (2) the hearing officer refused to allow certain essential witnesses at the disciplinary hearing; (3) that his disciplinary conviction was not supported by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ponte v. RealSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. In Re Habeas Corpus Application of PierpointSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  4. Hogue v. BruceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  5. Anderson v. McKuneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sauls v. McKuneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  2. Swafford v. McKuneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  3. Frost v. McKuneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  4. Elnicki v. SauersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  5. Jenkins v. Secretary of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API