Legal Opinion
Lopez v. World Savings & Loan Assn.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 2003No. A095666PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POLLAK, J.
Class action plaintiff challenges the practice of a federal savings and loan association of charging a fee of $10 for the transmission of a payoff demand statement by fax, over and above the fee authorized by Civil Code section 2943, subdivision (e)(6) for furnishing such a statement. Plaintiffs causes of action for violating this section and for engaging in an unfair, deceptive and unlawful business practice in violation of Business and Professions Code section 17200 were dismissed on the ground that the claims are preempted by federal law. Thereafter, summary judgment was…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Mabry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- McCurry v. Chevy Chase Bank, FSBWashington Supreme Court · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.