Goodin v. Palace Store Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.
Alleging that he was induced by fraudulent representations of its president to purchase capital stock of the Palace Store Company when that corporation was insolvent, and that he did not discover the fraud practiced upon him until the corporation made an assignment for the benefit of creditors, the plaintiff brought this action against the corporation and its assignee to rescind the sale and for the return of the purchase-price of the capital stock. The trial of the cause resulted in judgment in favor of the plaintiff. The defendants appealed.
Appellants contend that respondent was not induced…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hinkley v. Sac Oil & Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Meholin v. CarlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Ratcliff v. ClendeninCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Howard v. GlennSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Madison Trust Co. v. StahlmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hilton v. MumawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Kaas v. PrivetteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Lincoln v. KeeneWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Rummens v. Home Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Depositors Bond Co. v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.