Legal Opinion

Rummens v. Home Savings & Loan Ass'n

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1935No. 25554. Department OnePublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J. —

This action was brought to rescind a contract for two deposits in a savings and loan- association, which were induced by fraudulent representations as to the solvency of the institution at the time the deposits were made, and to recover a judgment for the amount thereof, plus legal interest. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the relief sought could not be had. From the judgment dismissing the action, the plaintiffs appeal.

There is no dispute as to the facts, and they may be briefly summarized as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stone v. Schiller Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Aberdeen Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Washington Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. DukeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Raynor v. Scandinavian-American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Bank of Fairfield v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Daurelle v. Traders Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State Ex Rel. Graham v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Drapeau v. Custodians of Telluride Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Radalj v. Union Savings & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
  5. People Ex Rel. Barrett v. Logan County Building & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API