Legal Opinion

Madison Trust Co. v. Stahlman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1915PublishedCited by 17 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. ' Appeal from the Chancery Conrt of Davidson County. — Jas. B. Newman, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice FaNgher

The original hill is to recover $14,000, and interest, on a promissory note executed by E. B. Stahlman on December 12, 1910. The complainant alleged that it was a holder in due course. The original note was first given payable to the Carnegie Trust Company in payment of stock in that corporation. It was transferred by the Carnegie Trust Company to the Van Norden Trust Company, which later by change of name became the Madison Trust Company. Several renewals were had, each one being delivered to the Carnegie Trust Company, and later delivered by it to the Madison Trust Company.

The defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. New York & Northern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. T. Towles & Co. v. MilesTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Pittsburg, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. DoddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. Chamberlain v. Fox Coal & Coke Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dale v. Thomas H. Temple Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Fidelity Trust Co. v. Service Laundry Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Neese v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
  4. Dillard & Coffin Co. v. Richmond Cotton Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Wright v. Jackson Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API