Legal Opinion
McKinley v. Bowlen
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 1, 2001No. 00-6344PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Rogers L. McKinley appeals a district court order granting summary judgment for the defendants in his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
After exhausting his administrative remedies, McKinley sued numerous Tennessee correctional officials and personnel, alleging that the defendants improperly denied him a prison job, convicted him of a disciplinary violation, placed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Thaddeus-X and Earnest Bell, Jr. v. BlatterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Amaefuna v. GamsbyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
- Bailey v. Hamilton County Government (DCLC3)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Bickham 777727 v. LomanDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2023
- Bingham v. Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Bird v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.