Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Hamilton County Government (DCLC3)
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided October 1, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00013Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE CHATTANOOGA DIVISION DEMETRIUS CORDELL BAILEY, ) ) ) 1:19-CV-00013-DCLC-SKL Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) HAMILTON COUNTY GOVERNMENT, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Hamilton County’s (“the County”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 28]. Plaintiff, Demetrius Cordell Bailey (“Bailey”) responded [Docs. 35 & 37]. The County filed a reply, which includes a Motion to Strike [Doc. 42]. Bailey responded to the Motion to Strike [Doc. 45]. These matters are now ripe for resolution.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lucas Burgess v. Gene FischerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.