Legal Opinion

State v. Bui

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2004No. 25976PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that in a prosecution for possession of burglar’s tools, Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 708-812(l)(a) (1993), (1) HRS § 708-812(l)(a) is not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad, (2) there was substantial evidence that Defendant-Appellant Ahn Cong Bui (Defendant) knew that at least one of the tools he possessed was “adapted, designed or commonly used for committing or facilitating the commission of an offense involving forcible entry into premises or theft by physical taking,” and (3) the jury instructions were not insufficient. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. BatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. PoneHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. MooreHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. SilvaHawaii Supreme Court · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Tauese v. State, Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. EspirituHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Laeroc Waikiki Parkside, LLC v. K.S.K. (Oahu) Ltd. PartnershipHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. RomanoHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. GomesHawaii Supreme Court · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API