State v. Romano
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*3Opinion of the Court by
ACOBA, J.
We hold that Defendant-Appellant Pame Ann Mary Leilani Romano (Defendant) has not established, as she argues on appeal, that (1) “[Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawai'i (the prosecution) ] failed to support a prima face [sic] case of prostitution because the [prosecution] failed to prove ... that Defendant was not a law enforcement officer,” (2) “the [prosecution] failed to present sufficient evidence to support a prima face [sic] case of prostitution,” (3) “there was insufficient evidence adduced to support a finding of guilt,” and (4) “Lawrence v. Texas[, 539…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. KikutaHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
- Erotic Service Provider Legal Education & Research Project v. GasconCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- State v. JING HUA XIAOHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KamHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Trinque.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.