Legal Opinion

State v. Romano

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2007No. 26110PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*3Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold that Defendant-Appellant Pame Ann Mary Leilani Romano (Defendant) has not established, as she argues on appeal, that (1) “[Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawai'i (the prosecution) ] failed to support a prima face [sic] case of prostitution because the [prosecution] failed to prove ... that Defendant was not a law enforcement officer,” (2) “the [prosecution] failed to present sufficient evidence to support a prima face [sic] case of prostitution,” (3) “there was insufficient evidence adduced to support a finding of guilt,” and (4) “Lawrence v. Texas[, 539…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. KikutaHawaii Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Erotic Service Provider Legal Education & Research Project v. GasconCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. State v. JING HUA XIAOHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. KamHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. Trinque.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API