Legal Opinion
In re Woodsome
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 1, 1926No. 1783PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, refusing the claims of appellants’ application for a patent, filed on February 1, 1922. The application contains the statement that it is a division of an original application filed by the applicants on June 21, 1921. The invention in question consists of a “steam circulating and regenerating system,” and the disclosure of the two applications is identical, both as to drawings and descriptions.
The original application contained numerous claims. Certain of these were specific in character, claiming the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Union Typewriter Co. v. L. C. Smith & Bros.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1909
- Otis Elevator Co. v. Portland Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1903
- Morse Chain Co. v. Link Belt Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1908
- Gold v. GoldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- Fassett v. Ewart Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
3Cited by8 opinions
- Helen Russell Pierce, of the Last Will and Testament of George Washington Pierce, Deceased v. Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- In Re CopemanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
- In Re LaughlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Application of EislerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- In the Matter of the Application of Sylvan O. GreenleeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.