Legal Opinion

Otis Elevator Co. v. Portland Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 1, 1903No. 474PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maine.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

This suit is for infringement of claims 1 and 2 of letters patent No. 453,955, dated June 9, 1891, to Norman C. Bassett, assignor to the Hydraulic Elevator Company. The opinion of the Circuit Court is. reported in 1x9 Fed. 928. The patent relates to means for actuating the stopping and starting or controlling mechanism of an elevator from the traveling cage. The claims are as follows:

“(1) A device for operating the stopping and starting mechanisms of an elevator, consisting of two cables or cable-sections hanging in the well adjacent to the path of the cage from fixed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Morley Sewing MacHine Co. v. LancasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Consolidated Safety-Valve Co. v. Crosby Steam Gauge & Valve Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Palmer Pneumatic Tire Co. v. LozierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Century Electric Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  2. American Communications Co., Inc. v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1954
  3. Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. Natco Pharma LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. Union Typewriter Co. v. L. C. Smith & Bros.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Fox Typewriter Co v. Corona Typewriter Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API