Heintz & Co. v. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LUONGO, District Judge.
Before the Court for consideration are motions of the third party defendants, *145Donald M. Kerr, Donald M. Kerr, Inc. and Suburban Marketers, Inc.(1) to dismiss the third party complaint under Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., Rule 12(b) 28 U.S.C.A., and(2) for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e).
The original complaint was instituted by Heintz & Co., Inc. against the defendant, Provident Tradesmens Bank and Trust Company (Bank), alleging a negligent failure on the part of Bank to observe “accepted banking practices” in its dealings with Donald M. Kerr, plaintiff’s Philadelphia…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Texas Water Supply Corp. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Fedorchak v. WardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- O'Malley v. Wyoming Nat. BankDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
- Pacific Fire Insurance v. DunmireDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- Quilty v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
3Cited by10 opinions
- Carroll Ex Rel. Carroll v. Fort James Corp. Ex Rel. Crown Zellerbach Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Hester v. BarnettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- General Accident Insurance v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Toberman v. CopasDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Altman v. Central of Georgia Railway CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.