Legal Opinion

Pacific Fire Insurance v. Dunmire

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1952No. Civ. No. 10347PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover premiums alleged to be due and owing to it under, a provisional fire insurance policy with defendants. Prior to answering the complaint, defendants filed motions for a more definite statement of claim and to dismiss the complaint.

Both motions relate to the sufficiency of the complaint and will be considered together. The function of a complaint under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., is to afford fair notice to the adversary of the nature and basis of the claim asserted and to furniáh a general statement of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Provident Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  4. Gen. Fin. Co. v. Pa. T. F.M.C. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. General Finance Co. v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heintz & Co. v. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API