Pacific Fire Insurance v. Dunmire
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover premiums alleged to be due and owing to it under, a provisional fire insurance policy with defendants. Prior to answering the complaint, defendants filed motions for a more definite statement of claim and to dismiss the complaint.
Both motions relate to the sufficiency of the complaint and will be considered together. The function of a complaint under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C., is to afford fair notice to the adversary of the nature and basis of the claim asserted and to furniáh a general statement of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- Provident Trust Co. v. Metropolitan Casualty Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Gen. Fin. Co. v. Pa. T. F.M.C. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- General Finance Co. v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Heintz & Co. v. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961