Legal Opinion

Shute v. Big Meadow Investment Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1921No. 2468PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Sixth Judicial District Court, Pershing County; C. J. McFadden, Judge. Action by James L. Shute against the Big Meadow Investment Company. From an order granting a new trial after judgment in his favor, plaintiff appeals. Respondent could have established a substantial record containing all of the objections made by plaintiff to evidence, with the rulings and exceptions, and other matters of error, if any, upon which it was desired to rely.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Sixth Judicial District Court, Pershing County; C. J. McFadden, Judge. Action by James L. Shute against the Big Meadow Investment Company. From an order granting a new trial after judgment in his favor, plaintiff appeals. Respondent could have established a substantial record containing all of the objections made by plaintiff to evidence, with the rulings and exceptions, and other matters of error, if any, upon which it was desired to rely. The record discloses that there was no attempt to establish such a record, but that reliance was had solely upon the fact of the destruction…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Ducker, J.:

On May 12, 1920, the district court rendered judgment in this case in favor of appellant.

Respondent noticed his intention to move for a new trial, assigning in said notice several statutory grounds. Thereafter respondent filed a paper indorsed “Statement in Lieu of Memo of Errors” containing the following :

“Comes now the defendant above named, by its *101attorneys, and says: That in its notice of intention to move for a new trial, heretofore filed in said above-entitled action, one of the grounds named, and upon which defendant chiefly relies, is the ground as stated in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Scott v. HainesNevada Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoffart v. Lindquist & Paget Mortgage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Ruiz Pérez v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967
  3. Sierra Pacific Power Company v. DayNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Bergendahl v. DavisNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ruiz Pérez v. Superior Court of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API