Legal Opinion

Bergendahl v. Davis

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1986No. 16510PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*259OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment, following a bench trial, against all appellants jointly and severally in the amount of $310,000. Because we conclude that an inordinate delay between the trial and the district court’s judgment effectively deprived appellants of their right to an appeal, we reverse and remand this matter for a new trial.

Respondent Davis sued appellants Chotas, Scoggin and Fischer for breach of a limited partnership agreement, breach of fiduciary duty, and conversion of a partnership asset. In the same action, Davis sued appellant Bergendahl and his various corporate…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Exton Drive-In, Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Morgan Express, Inc. v. Elizabeth-Perkins, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Brooks v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  4. Anderson v. RichardsNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Shute v. Big Meadow Investment Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Snyder v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Assad v. Nevada Commission on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. In Re AssadNevada Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API