Richardson v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Error to the District Court, Crook County, Hon. Carroll H. Parmrlrr, Judge. Noah T. Richardson, having been convicted of murder in the first degree, instituted proceedings in error within the time prescribed by statute therefor, and pending the same, moved that a new trial be granted on the ground that he had been prevented from having the necessary bill of exceptions signed and from perfecting the necessary record for a review of the judgment complained of, without fault on…
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court, Crook County, Hon. Carroll H. Parmrlrr, Judge. Noah T. Richardson, having been convicted of murder in the first degree, instituted proceedings in error within the time prescribed by statute therefor, and pending the same, moved that a new trial be granted on the ground that he had been prevented from having the necessary bill of exceptions signed and from perfecting the necessary record for a review of the judgment complained of, without fault on the part of himself or counsel. The material facts are stated in the opinion. The case was heard upon the motion.
1Opinion of the Court
Potter, Chief Justice.
This case is in an unfortunate condition. Noah T. Richardson was convicted of the crime'of murder in the first degree upon an information charging him with that crime at the May, 1906, term of the District Court of Crook County. Upon the denial of his motion for new trial at the same term, he was sentenced to suffer the death penalty, and it was ordered that he be taken to the penitentiary to be there confined until the execution of the sentence, the date fixed for such execution being August 3, 1906. On June 25, 1906, he filed his petition in error in this court for a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hume v. BowieSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Etchells v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Borrowscale v. BosworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- State ex rel. Downing v. GaslinNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Curran v. WilcoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Schmidt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Farbotnik v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Bearpaw v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.