Legal Opinion

Town of Southington v. Commercial Union Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 3, 1999No. AC 18088PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LANDAU, J.

The defendant, Commercial Union Insurance Company, appeals from the judgment, rendered *329after a trial to the court, in favor of the plaintiff, the town of Southington (town), enforcing a subdivision bond provided by the defendant as surety. The issue that is dispositive of the defendant’s appeal is its claim that a surety’s liability is limited to the cost of improvements necessary to provide services to subdivision lots conveyed prior to the expiration of the approval of the subdivision application. Because General Statutes § 8-26c (c)1 limits a surety’s liability to the cost…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. United Illuminating Co. v. GroppoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Mazur v. BlumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town of Southington v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Town of Southington v. Commercial Union InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Lunn v. Cummings & LockwoodConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  4. Town of Southington v. Commercial Union InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Town of Southington v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API