Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Gill
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 1, 1980No. 717PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NIX, Justice.
Appellant, Robert Gill, was charged with possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance in violation of the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, Act of April 14, 1972, P.L. 233, No. 64, § 13(a)(30); as amended, 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(30). A pretrial motion to suppress evidence was denied after a hearing and appellant was tried by a jury. Appellant was found guilty and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of one and a half to three years. He was ordered to pay a fine of $50.00. On appeal, the Superior Court affirmed per curiam.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. HortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- In re Sale of Properties by Indiana County Tax Claim Bureau for Unpaid Tax ClaimsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AriondoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. CardonaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. SmagalaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.