Commonwealth v. Cardona
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CIRILLO, Judge:
Appellant was charged with possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, 1 heroin. After a jury trial and conviction, the appellant, on July 8, 1980, moved for a new trial on the following grounds:
1. The verdict is contrary to the evidence.
2. The verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence.
3. The verdict is contrary to the law.
The appellant later filed a brief raising specific issues of law, including the admissibility of confessional statements and the propriety of the prosecutor’s remarks to the jury in closing argument.
The trial court denied the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. GravelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. PronkoskieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. RogersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. BrachbillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.