Commonwealth v. Horton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MANDERINO, Justice.
Appellant, Charles Horton, was tried before a judge and jury and convicted of murder in the third degree for the stabbing death of Donald Bell. Post-verdict motions were denied, and sentence of five to ten years imprisonment was imposed. This direct appeal followed.
Appellant raises two issues here. First, he contends he should be discharged, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury’s finding of guilt of murder in the third degree. As has been often said by us, when called upon to review the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a criminal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- In Re PlattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LovetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. RansomeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. CrawfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. HelmSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.