Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Amick

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided February 13, 1997No. C 94-4062-MWBPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT TRAUM’S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL AND PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR FEES AND COSTS

TABLE OF

I. BACKGROUND .........................................................1092

II. LEGAL ANALYSIS......................................................1093

A. Motion For New Trial.................................................1093

1. Standards for a new trial...........................................1093

2. Sufficiency of the evidence..........................................1093

3. Improper jury instruction..........................................1095

4. Improper…

2Cases cited92 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baker v. John Morrell & Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
  2. Sherman v. KasotakisDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004
  3. Greenfield Mills, Inc. v. CarterDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2008
  4. Saleh v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  5. Rural Water System No. 1 v. SIOUX CENTER, IOWADistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API