Legal Opinion

Frischer & Co. v. Bakelite Corporation

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 10, 1930No. 3009PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

This matter comes to this court on appeal from the United State Tariff Commission under the provisions of section 316 of the *250Tariff Act of 1923, 42 Stat. 858, 943 (19 USCA §§ 174-180').

O'n December 16, 1925, Bakelite Corpora^ tion, a corporation organized under the laws of tbe state of Delaware, Abse Bros., a co-partnership, with its principal place of business in New York, and the Embed Art Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of New Jersey, filed with the United States Tariff Commission a complaint, under oath, asking relief under said…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
  3. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Booth v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 1945
  4. Union Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Han Baek Trading Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. In Re Amtorg Trading CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API