Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Shafer
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 1921No. Civ. No. 3155PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
SHENK, J., pro tem.
This is an action against the contractor and his surety on a faithful performance bond given pursuant to the Street Improvement Act of 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 954).
In May, 1917, the city of Los Angeles, after proceedings regularly taken, invited proposals for the' improvement of Oregon and Ezra Streets. The defendant M. T. Shafer submitted a bid to do the work for $4,487.84. The bid was accepted and the contract, which was awarded to him, was executed on June 16, 1917. On the same day the defendant Shafer and Maryland Casualty Company, as his surety, executed a bond in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Keeble v. KeebleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Pacific Factor Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Long Beach City School District v. DodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Thomas v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Marston v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Petrovich v. City of ArcadiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Six Companies of California v. Joint Highway Dist. No. 13Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Berkeley Unified School Dist. of Alameda County v. James I. Barnes Const. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Petrovich v. City of ArcadiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950