Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 24, 1998PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
Before this court in our original jurisdiction are preliminary objections filed by the Department of Corrections and the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (collectively, Respondents) to a petition for review filed pro se by Stanley Stewart (Petitioner), an individual incarcerated at State Correctional Institution-Graterford (SCIG).
In his petition Petitioner asserts that Respondents have established arbitrary policies that deny inmates parole solely on the basis of their original offenses so that Respondents may “gain proceeds” from the state and federal governments. He…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Joseph Coady v. Donald T. Vaughn the District Attorney of the County of Montgomery the Attorney General of the State of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- John William Dunn v. Raymond J. ColleranCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Wilbur Richardson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole Attorney General of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Mickens-Thomas v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Cimaszewski v. Bd. of Probation and ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.