Legal Opinion
Cimaszewski v. Bd. of Probation and Parole
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 24, 2005No. 22 EAP 2002PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice BAER.
Appellant Stanley Cimaszewski, a prisoner incarcerated at the State Correctional Institute in Somerset, Pennsylvania, appeals from the Commonwealth Court’s order dismissing his Petition for Review in the Nature of a Complaint in Mandamus. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the Commonwealth Court’s order denying Appellant relief on his petition for mandamus.
Appellant was convicted of robbery, possessing an instrument of crime, and carrying a firearm without a license in 1982. In November of 1983, the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County sentenced Appellant…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Newman v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Shawn Parker v. Donald Kelchner, Superintendent Attorney General of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Wilbur Richardson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole Attorney General of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Yates v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.