Legal Opinion
Trico Products Corporation v. Delman Company
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided September 27, 1961No. Civ. A. 3-648, 3-731PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN PELT, District Judge.
By agreement of the parties the two cases above described have been consolidated for trial. Both are so-called patent cases involving windshield clearing systems. The first case filed involved two patents; the first count concerns United States Patent Number 2,206,814 issued to plaintiff on July 2, 1940 as assignee of Erwin C. Horton, and charges infringement by defendants of claims 5 and 6. In the second count plaintiff alleges ownership of United States Patent Number 2,717,556 issued to it September 13, 1955 as assignee of George O. Bartoo. Only claims 1, 2 and 4…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Briggs v. M & J Diesel Locomotive Filter Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964
- Azoplate Corporation v. Silverlith, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- Oelbaum v. Lovable CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Forbro Design Corp. v. Raytheon Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975
- Lugash v. Santa Anita Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.