Legal Opinion
Azoplate Corporation v. Silverlith, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 9, 1973No. Civ. A. 3235PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.
This is a suit for infringement of United States Patent No. 3,046,110 (110) issued to Maximilian P. Schmidt and assigned to plaintiff. The pleadings present issues of the validity and enforceability of the patent, infringement and an antitrust counterclaim based on alleged monopolization of the presensi-tized positive printing plate industry. 1 The case has been tried before this Court and the following opinion constitutes its findings of fact and conclusions of law.
BACKGROUND
The subject invention is an improvement in the art of printing plates…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Frederick H. Norton v. Lawrence E. CurtissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Muncie Gear Works, Inc. v. Outboard, Marine & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Paeco, Inc., in No. 76-1495 v. Applied Moldings, Inc. And Michael R. Sigal, in No. 76-1496 v. Arlen Realty and Development CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- William R. Watts v. The University of Delaware, an Agency of the State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Johnson & Johnson v. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Aluminum Co. of America v. Amerola Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.