Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Buckman v. Munson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1943No. 29451PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

Counsel for the respondent contend that necessary retrenchment in expenditure of public funds is a justifiable ground for laying off an officer or employee in the classified service of a municipality, -and therefore the disclosure in the petition that the layoff complained of was for reasons of economy •renders the petition vulnerable to a demurrer on the .-ground that the facts stated therein are insufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Counsel for the relator contend that the position held by the relator, having been established by an -ordinance of the city of Cleveland pursuant to and…

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gannon v. PerkOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State ex rel. Sigall v. Aetna Cleaning Contractors of Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. City of Cincinnati Ex Rel. Simons v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. Hartnett v. ZellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API