Pantuso v. Pittsburgh Motor Coach Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
Defendant appeals from judgments for the minor plaintiff and his mother in their suit for damages for personal injury suffered by tiie minor. Defendant’s only complaint is that its motion for judgment n. o. vl was refused. If there is evidence from which the jury could find negligence, the judgments must be affirmed. As,the plaintiffs have the verdict the evidence and inferences from it must now be taken in the sense most favorable to plaintiffs. So examined, the jury may have found the facts now to be stated. At about 1:15 on a Saturday afternoon, January 22, 1944,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hughes v. Pittsburgh Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- O'Malley v. Laurel Line Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Lyons Et Ux. v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Vogel v. StupiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Duffy v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stewart v. ChernickySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Rockwell v. KaplanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Karam v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Satterwhite v. National Powder Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Abell v. Fidelity Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.