Duffy v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Walling,
Sixty-seventh Street, extending through Philadelphia in a northerly and southerly direction, is crossed at right angles by Lansdowne Avenue and defendant’s double track street railway going north in the former turns west into the latter. The customary stop for outbound cars was at the southeast corner of the intersection, but at the time in question, Sixty-seventh Street being torn up, the stop was made on the curve. This enabled passengers to alight in the paved cartway which was intact on the north side of Lansdowne Avenue. On the evening of June 3, 1923,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bockelcamp v. Lackawanna & Wyoming Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Perret Et Ux. v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Low v. Harrisburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Theisen v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Englehaupt v. Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lyons Et Ux. v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Pedretti v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Pantuso v. Pittsburgh Motor Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Zalewski v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Miller v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.