Legal Opinion

Vogel v. Stupi

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1947No. Appeals, 9 and 10PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This action in trespass was instituted for James J. Vogel, a minor, by his father as guardian, and by his parents, Frank and Iona Vogel, in their own behalf. One defendant was Walter Stupi, the driver of an automobile which struck the minor plaintiff shortly after he had alighted from a school bus which was operated by Johns-town Traction Company, the other defendant. At the trial, the jury returned verdicts against both defendants. Motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial having been made by each defendant, and refused by the court en banc, the following…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Earl W. Baker & Co. v. LagalyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  2. Phillips v. HardgroveWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Taylor v. Patterson's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  4. Stuckwish v. Hagan Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Coyne v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. SOMMERS v. HESSLERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Pantuso v. Pittsburgh Motor Coach Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Lewis v. GoodmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Dowbenko v. Philadelphia Transportation Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API