Rockwell v. Kaplan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Bók,
The facts need not be repeated here, since they have been fully set forth in Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones’s opinion in Rockwell v. Stone, 404 Pa. 561 (1961), 173 A. 2d 48. Suffice it. to say that .plaintiff recovered a, verdict against both doctors, who have separately ap-. péáled. Dr. Kaplan, the subject of this opinion,- asks-judgment n.b.v. or, if he may nbt-have it, a new trial.-' Both requests were refused' below and this appeal is' from the ensuing judgment.
Since we are. considering a. motion for judgment n.o.v., the evidence must be seen in the light most…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McConnell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Yorston v. PennellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Beatty v. HoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Coradi v. Sterling Oil CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Flagiello v. Pennsylvania HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Collins v. HandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- TONSIC Et Vir. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Schneider v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, Northern DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Mazer v. LipschutzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.